test222

Updated on 12 January 2021

 

CITES CoP17 – A CoP of “Firsts” and a Turning Point for the World’s Wildlife

John E. Scanlon, Secretary General, CITES

In every corner of our planet, a variety of threats such as habitat loss, climate change, over-exploitation and illegal trade put intense pressure on wild populations of animals and plants.

Illicit trafficking in wildlife now takes place at an industrial scale driven by transnational organized criminal groups. The phenomena poses a real and immediate danger to some of our most precious species.

Fortunately, the international community has a legally binding agreement addressing these threats. It is the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, also known as CITES, and it is responsible for regulating international trade in wild animals and plants. The Convention also monitors and responds to both unsustainable and illegal wildlife trade.

The more than 180 nations, known as Parties[1], that are signatories to CITES meet once every three years. At the end of September and into October 2016, they convened in Johannesburg, South Africa for their seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP17). The meeting was also known as the World Wildlife Conference.

Setting the Stage for CoP17

Several events never before held in conjunction with a CITES CoP preceded CoP17.

South Africa’s Minister for Environmental Affairs, Dr. Edna Molewa, convened the first-ever ‘Ministerial Lekgotla’, which focused on CITES and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.[2] The meeting attracted close to 50 Ministers worldwide as well as the Secretary-General of the World Customs Organization, the Head of UN Environment, and the Director-General of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

The inaugural ‘Youth Forum for People and Wildlife’ also took place in the lead up to CoP17 and  brought together 34 committed young leaders from 25 countries.[3] Together with South Africa’s Youth and Conservation Programme, the Forum provided the impetus for the adoption of the first-ever CITES Resolution on Youth engagement.

Further, HRH The Duke of Cambridge, a global champion in the fight against illegal wildlife trade,[4] spearheaded [LA1] a[S2] unique event that connected Johannesburg, London and Tokyo via satellite. This virtual gathering drew international attention to illegal wildlife trade and generated momentum going into CoP17.

And, in an unprecedented initiative, the CITES and Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Secretariats joined forces to hold four joint regional meetings in August – in Africa, Asia, Central and South America and the Caribbean, and Oceania – to help Parties prepare for CoP17 and the 13th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the CBD (COP13).[5] These meetings were invaluable in assisting Parties prepare for these critical meetings[S3] .

The Opening Ceremony – Delegates Drum to the Same Beat!

The CoP was formally opened by the President of the Republic of South Africa, Jacob Zuma. Following his speech, a vibrant and energizing opening ceremony saw all delegates beating their own drums, all slightly differently, but to the same beat. In many ways this ceremony would capture the spirit of the CoP itself, with delegates expressing differing views on issues, but all working towards the same objective.[6]

This creative and invigorating opening to CoP17 set the right atmosphere for the next nine days of intense, and at times robust, discussion. The CoP would foster dialogue among 2,600 delegates from more than 160 countries who all participated in a marathon series of deliberations and decisions covering trade in over 500 species of animals and plants[LA4] [S5] . Another 1,000 media and local visitors also attended the CoP, with overall numbers at CoP17 exceeding 3,500 people.

What was Decided at CoP17

CoP17 in South Africa will be remembered as the largest CITES CoP in the 43-year history of the Convention, both in terms of the number of participants and issues tabled for discussion.  More importantly, the meeting was a game changer that delivered on new frontiers for wildlife in ways never before seen.

By the end of CoP17, CITES Parties adopted 51 of the 62 proposals[7] to change the listing status of close to 500 species of wild animals and plants under CITES Appendices,[8] 39 resolutions and 312 decisions.[9]  These far reaching outcomes of CoP17 will impact on wildlife and ecosystems, as well as on people and economies.

And CoP17 achieved these outcomes in record time, finishing one day ahead of schedule for the first time ever. This was testament to a combination of a generous Host Government in South Africa that created the perfect mood for the CoP, fantastic goodwill amongst the Parties, excellent preparation by the Host, Parties and the Secretariat, and the active and constructive involvement of many different observers.

CoP17 met the expectation that it would be the most critical meeting of the Convention’s 43-year history. of the Convention.[10]

CITES “Firsts” - Corruption, Cybercrime, Demand Reduction and More

At CoP17, for the first time, Parties took targeted decisions on corruption, cybercrime, traceability, demand reduction for illegally traded animals and plants and legal acquisition findings, as well as major decisions on captive breeding. These decisions greatly enhanced outcomes from CoP16 held in 2013,[11] thereby closing the circle on the package of measures needed to bring illegal wildlife trade to an end.

The “firsts” were not limited to the CoP itself. In the margins of CoP17, the first Wildlife Crime Global Partnerships Coordination Forum[12] was hosted by the International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC)[13] and the INTERPOL Wildlife Crime Working Group convened.[14]

It was the second time the world’s wildlife enforcement networks met,[15] following their initial meeting at CoP16. Participants agreed that ICCWC, the wildlife enforcement networks and the INTERPOL Working Group should continue to convene at each CITES CoP.

New Marine and Timber Species

Many new animals and plants, including marine species, such as silky and thresher sharks and devil rays, as well as hundreds of timber species, such as those in the entire genus Dalbergia (inclusive of over 300 species of rosewood), were all brought under the CITES trade control regime for the first time.[16] These decisions built upon the momentum that started in 2013 with CoP16, where Parties turned to CITES help ensure sustainably in managing ocean and forest flora and fauna.[17]

These new marine and timber listings at CoP16 and CoP17 represented a dramatic and positive shift in the use of this pragmatic and effective Convention in preventing the over-exploitation of commercially taken marine and forest species of wild animals and plants.

Increased Protection and Well-targeted Enforcement

Several other species, and most notably all eight species of pangolins, were given added protection under CITES through an Appendix I listing. Many other species, including the cheetah, elephant, helmeted hornbill, tigers, totoaba (and vaquita), and rhino were the subject of specific decisions on improved conservation and management, and enhanced and well-targeted enforcement action and demand reduction strategies.

Elephants and Lions

Efforts to open up legal trade in elephant ivory and rhino horn were rejected, stronger decisions were taken to control domestic ivory markets, the National Ivory Action Plan process was put on a secure footing. The process of developing a decision making mechanism for ivory trade was ended.

At the same time, efforts to add four populations of African elephants to Appendix I, which could have resulted in opening up ivory trade through Parties entering reservations against such an up-listing,[18] were also rejected. This closed the door on any prospect of opening up legal international trade in ivory through the decisions taken at CoP17.

Concerning African lions, for the first time, a dedicated set of measures was agreed to improve the effectiveness of lion conservation and management throughout its range, coupled with the first-ever global ban on commercial trade in wild taken lion bones, claws, skeletons, skulls and teeth.

Conservation Successes

CoP17 also saw a number of conservation success stories where trade regulations of species were eased in recognition of healthy wild populations, as in the case of the South African Cape Mountain zebra and several crocodile species.

New Species that Did Not Make Headlines

A brief snapshot of CoP17 does not do justice to the many lesser known, but equally important species that were brought under CITES trade controls for the first time. These include the nautilus and Grandidier’s baobab tree, and many amphibians and reptiles, such as alligator lizards, the psychedelic rock gecko, the Chinese crocodile lizard, the Titicaca water frog, and the tomato frog --  species often unsustainably exploited for the pet trade.

Hearing the Voices of Rural Communities and Youth

Also for the first time at a CITES CoP, the voices of rural communities and youth were at the heart of the Johannesburg meeting. This was a defining feature of CoP17, and decisions were taken to determine a way forward on how these groups can be better integrated into CITES’ processes, which will be further considered at CoP18 to be held in Sri Lanka in 2019.

What Happens Next

The decisions taken at CoP17 will not stay in the committee rooms of the Sandton Convention Centre. They will soon be reflected in legislation, regulation and operating practices across the world.[19] This will directly affect when, where and how wildlife and wildlife products can be bought and sold.

At CoP17, CITES was positioned as an agreement critical for achieving broader goals and targets, including the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with the CITES Strategic Vision 2020 being amended to make specific reference to the SDGs. Wildlife trade is now firmly embedded in the agendas of global law enforcement, development and financing agencies, and these agencies will further deploy their collective capacity and expertise to implement the Convention on the frontlines of conservation, where it matters most.

Wildlife is Linked to Our Own Survival

The survival of humankind depends on the presence of wild animals and plants. . It is therefore in our self-interest to safeguard wildlife not only for its own intrinsic value but also for the many benefits it confers to people and livelihoods.  

As such was captured in the founding text of the Convention itself, which recognizes that wild fauna and flora is “an irreplaceable part of the natural systems of the earth” with ever-growing value from “aesthetic, scientific, cultural, recreational and economic points of view.”[S6] .

While we are still absorbing the full suite of decisions taken in Johannesburg, we are convinced that they will be a turning point in ensuring the survival of the world’s most vulnerable wildlife.

Time will tell whether this statement proves to be correct. For now, we will rapidly move to the implementation phase of our work as we look ahead to Colombo, Sri Lanka for CoP18 in 2019.

-----

Links

CITES Closing media release: Largest ever World Wildlife Conference hailed as a ‘game changer’

IISD ENB Summary

IISD ENB Meeting Coverage

CITES CoP17 web page

CITES Opening media release: Largest-ever World Wildlife Conference opens in Johannesburg with calls for changes to protection levels of 500 species of wild animals and plants

Pre CoP17 opinion pieces

Tackling corruption will deal a lethal blow to the illegal wildlife trade – External link

Illicit wildlife trafficking is about people - they alone can fix it - External link

In a world of 7 billion people how can we protect wildlife? - External link

Empowering Youth to Secure the Future of Wildlife – External link

A Virtuous Cycle for Conservation – External link

CoP17 Opening Speeches

President of the Republic of South Africa

Minister of Environmental Affairs

Chair, CITES Standing Committee

Head, UN Environment

Secretary-General, CITES



[1]There are currently 183 Parties to CITES, with the Kingdom of Tonga formally becoming the 183rd Party to the Convention on 20 October 2016.

[3]It was initiated by IFAW and made possible by the Disney Conservation Fund, together with the Jane Goodall Institute, the CITES Secretariat, the South African Government Department of Environment Affairs and the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

[4]Time for Change Event, 22 September 2016, which was made possible through the support of Tusk and ISPS Handa.

[6]IISD ENB Highlights, 24 September.

[7]With five proposals rejected and six being withdrawn.

[8]There is a full list of outcomes on the Proposals.

[9]Noting that a number of these were to amend existing decisions and resolutions. See in-session documents.

[10]Being described as ‘The most important conservation event you’ve never heard of is about to start’, by The Washington Post, 23 September, 2016

[16]According to the first World Wildlife Crime Report, released earlier this year, rosewood, which Dalbergia species contribute the bulk of, accounts for 35% of the total global seizure value of wild animals and plants, far higher than elephant ivory, rhino horn and pangolin combined.

[19]The changes to the Appendices come into force 90 days after their adoption, on 4 October, with the exception of the devil rays (delayed for six months) and silky and thresher sharks (delayed for 12 months).


 [LA1]is this word choice ok?

 [S2]Seems OK

 [S3]I forgot to mention these meetings. Seems like the best place is here to insert it. Feel free to edit!

 [LA4]Did media participate in the discussions and decision? You may want to clarify.

 [S5]Have edited

 [S6]Does this work…?